Author name: moderat ereport

A divided federal appeals court on Friday threw out an agreement that would have allowed accused Sept. 11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed to plead guilty in a deal sparing him the risk of execution for al-Qaida’s 2001 attacks. The decision by a panel of the federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., undoes an attempt to wrap up more than two decades of military prosecution beset by legal and logistical troubles. It signals there will be no quick end to the long struggle by the U.S. military and successive administrations to bring to justice the man charged with planning one of the deadliest attacks ever on the United States. The deal, negotiated over two years and approved by military prosecutors and the Pentagon’s senior official for Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, a year ago, stipulated life sentences without parole for Mohammed and two co-defendants. The Camp VI detention facility in Guantanamo Bay Naval Base, Cuba. Mohammed is accused of developing and directing the plot to crash hijacked airliners into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. Another of the hijacked planes flew into a field in Pennsylvania. The men also would have been obligated to answer any lingering questions that families of the victims have about the attacks. But then-Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin repudiated the deal, saying a decision on the death penalty in an attack as grave as Sept. 11 should only be made by the defense secretary. Attorneys for the defendants had argued that the agreement was already legally in effect and that Austin, who served under President Joe Biden, acted too late to try to throw it out. A military judge at Guantanamo and a military appeals panel agreed with the defense lawyers. But, by a 2-1 vote, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit found Austin acted within his authority and faulted the military judge’s ruling. The panel had previously put the agreement on hold while it considered the appeal, first filed by the Biden administration and then continued under President Donald Trump. Related | Meet the 22-year-old leading Trump’s terrorism prevention hub “Having properly assumed the convening authority, the Secretary determined that the ‘families and the American public deserve the opportunity to see military commission trials carried out.’ The Secretary acted within the bounds of his legal authority, and we decline to second-guess his judgment,” Judges Patricia Millett and Neomi Rao wrote. Millett was an appointee of President Barack Obama while Rao was appointed by Trump. In a dissent, Judge Robert Wilkins, an Obama appointee, wrote, “The government has not come within a country mile of proving clearly and indisputably that the Military Judge erred.”

A cartoon by Pedro Molina. Related | Trump and Texas point fingers as flood death toll rises

The White House has returned to meme mode, this time sharing a doctored image of President Donald Trump as Superman just days after MAGA pundits called the new superhero reboot too “woke.” The surreal post, shared on the official White House X account, shows Trump’s face on the Man of Steel’s body with the caption: “THE SYMBOL OF HOPE. TRUTH. JUSTICE. THE AMERICAN WAY. SUPERMAN TRUMP.” It didn’t take long for the backlash to follow. “I never thought I’d see the day when the White House is just a joke. This is so embarrassing,” one user commented. “I found his kryptonite… the Epstein files,” another joked, making a subtle jab at Trump’s long-rumored links to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, who died in 2019. But not everyone was upset. Actor Dean Cain, who played Superman in the ’90s TV series “Lois & Clark,” responded to the White House’s post with a laughing-crying emoji.  A vocal Trump supporter, Cain also told TMZ, “How woke is Hollywood going to make this character? How much is Disney going to change their Snow White? Why are they going to change these characters [to] exist for the times?” It’s clear what sparked the meme: MAGA’s latest obsession with the new “Superman” movie, turning it into a culture war battleground. Director James Gunn, best known for “Guardians of the Galaxy,” added fuel to the fire by calling Superman “the story of America. An immigrant who came from other places and populated the country.”  He’s not the first to say so. In 2019, DC Comics described Superman as “the ultimate example of a refugee who makes his new home better,” noting that the character was created by the sons of Jewish immigrants. That framing—Superman as an immigrant—was just too much for some conservatives. Fox News host Greg Gutfeld criticized it on “The Five,” calling it a “terrible analogy,” while Kellyanne Conway complained, “We don’t go to the movie theater to be lectured to.” Ben Shapiro also jumped in with a video titled “Superman is Going WOKE.” Kellyanne Conway is among the right-wing commentators who are triggered by the “Superman” reboot’s “wokeness.” The film, heavily promoted and projected to gross more than $200 million globally, now also serves as a political flashpoint. Trump’s meme may attract conservative moviegoers, but it comes amid his administration’s sweeping immigration crackdown, which has prompted lawsuits and protests nationwide. Interestingly, the controversy around “Superman” is just the latest flare-up in a broader right-wing crusade against so-called “woke” reboots. Like Disney’s live-action adaptations of “The Little Mermaid” and “Snow White,” which faced backlash and racist tirades for casting women of color as leads, Gunn’s film has become part of the culture war crossfire. For Trump, this isn’t the first time he’s photoshopped himself into pop culture. In May, the White House posted an AI image of him dressed as the pope, even though Trump isn’t even Catholic. For a president who’s always viewed himself as larger than life, the “Superman Trump” image might be less about trolling and more about projection. But with a blockbuster film and a major immigration battle happening at the same time, the symbolism feels as unhinged as it is on-brand.

Another one of President Donald Trump’s goons has given into the appeal of playing dress up for the sake of showing he means business.  Energy Secretary Chris Wright appeared on Fox News Friday in a hard hat, safety goggles, and reflective vest to announce the opening of a new rare earths mine. Wright stood safely in front of the cameras with his new outfit on as he announced the new energy project.  move over, Cosplay Kristi [image or embed] — Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) July 11, 2025 at 11:42 AM The former CEO of oil and gas giant Liberty Energy channeled his colleague Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem for the TV hit, who has become a pro at playing dress up for the occasion. Noem—not unlike Attorney General Pam Bondi—has been spotted parading as U.S. Navy, a firewoman, a border patrol agent, and who knows what else since taking on her new role in Trump’s Cabinet. But as for Wright, who has been tirelessly pushing unregulated energy across the U.S. with the help of his energy-focused Cabinet buddies—his outfit may be for show, but the mine is very real. The U.S. has officially opened its first rare earths mine in 70 years in Wyoming. The goods found in these mines have been a hot topic leading into Trump’s term when the president started talking about plans to take over Greenland because it is a mineral- and oil-dense island.  Related |Trump’s Greenland delusions of grandeur are based on a deceiving map And while Trump has presently eased on his idea to annex the peaceful territory of Denmark, the need for the U.S. to rely less on China’s supply of neodymium and dysprosium to fuel resources like electric car batteries and emerging AI technology is ever growing.  With that being said, players like Wright and Interior Secretary Doug Burgum have been working overtime to break ground on various different types of energy projects across the U.S. to fuel whatever resources tech and AI might need. From uranium to coal and now rare earth metals, the administration has openly cut corners to fast track mines in an attempt to get pickaxes into the dirt faster than ever.  As for why Wright needs to play dress up to do the dirty work, that one we don’t have an answer for. 

It’s always so nice when your work friends help with your personal projects, right? Having a work pal who knows about motorbikes come by on a Saturday to get yours running is a thing of communal beauty, a pleasing blurring of the lines between work and play.  So, for Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., it’s gotta feel nice that the Department of Justice is helping out with a lawsuit that Kennedy brought in 2023 on behalf of the anti-vaccine organization he founded, Children’s Health Defense. That organization and several other misinformation-loving groups sued The Washington Post, the BBC, the Associated Press, and Reuters, alleging the news outlets banded together to illegally boycott and suppress their dangerous anti-vaccine conspiracy claptrap. And the DOJ’s statement of interest, filed on Friday, backs this nonsense claim.  One doesn’t need a fancy law degree to see how unsettling and unethical it is that the administration has picked up the torch on a lawsuit tied to a Cabinet member that was filed before he took on his new role. At least, Kennedy remembered to withdraw as an attorney of record after joining the government. That’s a bit more than what then-interim U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Ed Martin did when, in his role as D.C.’s top prosecutor, he dismissed charges against a Jan. 6 rioter whom Martin had recently represented.  A vial of Moderna COVID-19 vaccine rests on a table at an inoculation station in Jackson, Mississippi, in July 2022. But since no one cares about conflicts of interest any longer, here we are.  Children’s Health Defense lucked out—and not just because Kennedy became HHS secretary. Both President Donald Trump personally and his administration generally are very familiar with harassing media companies for not platforming right-wing lies. So why not bring that vast experience to bear for one of Kennedy’s pet projects? Children’s Health Defense’s legal claim is that the media companies illegally colluded to boycott the speech of Children’s Health Defense and other anti-science types by forming a “Trusted News Initiative” to combat COVID-19 misinformation. Per the Children’s Health Defense, that violates the Sherman Act, the federal antitrust law.  That might sound familiar since it’s a similar theory to what the Federal Trade Commission required as a condition to approve a merger between two large ad agencies. To get government sign-off, the post-merger agency had to enter into a consent order to resolve the FTC’s complaint that advertising agencies illegally colluded to boycott running advertising on certain media platforms. The consent order bans the agency from refusing to place ads on platforms based on ideological content and also bans them from declining to deal with an advertiser based on their political views. And when it comes to suing media companies because they made you sad and that somehow broke the law, who is better at it than Donald Trump?  What good fortune that Kennedy has such powerful friends to help him out here. Everyone is sure to enjoy this new reality where we’re forced to sit, eyes pinned open “Clockwork Orange”-style, as a steady stream of misinformation and hate speech is beamed directly into our eyeballs, courtesy of the United States government.

PoliticusUSA can be independent because we are 100% supported by readers like you. Please support our work by becoming a subscriber. Subscribe now One of the advantages of the Republican decision to delay Medicaid cuts until after the 2028 election is that there is time for situations to change. One of the biggest changes that could be on the horizon is Democrats taking control of all or part of Congress in the 2026 midterm election. The Medicaid cuts have proven to be so unpopular that Democrats think that they can be easily repealed. Semafor reported: Congressional Democrats are already plotting how to reverse Republicans’ just-passed Medicaid cuts if they take the House or Senate majorities in 2026. And they’re notably confident that they’ll get the GOP votes they need to do it. .. “There’s a very realistic prospect that the votes to cut Medicaid will prove to be some of the least popular votes in congressional history, and that it might be actually quite easy to effectuate the repeal, once people see and understand what these crazy people did,” Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I. told Semafor, adding in a joking faux-Republican voice: “‘Get me out of here! Get me out of here!‘” … Some Republicans are already indicating they’re open to an intervention. Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., has said repeatedly he hopes to ensure “there are no Medicaid cuts that take effect.” PoliticusUSA is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support our work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. At least on the Senate side, it is looking like many Republicans view the cuts as a budgetary gimmick that was meant to make the tax cuts bill look better on paper. Several Senate Republicans have been quoted as willing to delay indefinitely or scrap the cuts. None of this can happen unless Democrats get control of the House, which is where the most extreme Medicaid cutters currently occupy the majority. If Democrats get the House majority, they can immediately use budget deadlines to demand a repeal of the Medicaid cuts. Trump is trapped in his own delusion that Medicaid isn’t being cut, and there are enough Senators to kill the cuts without a Democratic majority in the Senate to make them happen. All that is needed is for Democrats to have some power and a seat at the table to demand the cuts. Republicans have made it clear that they don’t want the cuts to Medicaid through the delay in implementation. Democrats are much better at governing than Republicans, and right now, Democrats see an opening and are laying the groundwork to make Medicaid cuts disappear, but in order to do so, they need your votes in 2026. What do you think about Democrats planning to repeal the Medicaid cuts? Leave a comment

PoliticusUSA is independent news that you can trust. Please consider supporting our work by becoming a subscriber. Subscribe now The majority of the American people have turned on Trump’s immigration policy, and no longer support it. The administration is not taking it well that the issue on which Trump thought he got elected is now a major weakness. Trump border czar Tom Homan went on Fox News and first tried to blame the media for the public turning against the right-wing deportation agenda. Homan said: The working men and women of ICE are doing is incredible. We are looking for over 300,000 missing children. We have already found 10,000. Have you heard that anywhere? No, the media is simply not covering it. Look, this should be a nonpartisan issue. Arresting public safety threats and national security threats, everybody be on the same page on that. Rescuing children, I mean, it should be a nonpartisan issue. Everybody should be in lock step on that. But they’re not. The media is lying. The Democrats are — they don’t want President Trump to be successful. I got news for them. We are being successful. Every illegal alien, public safety threat we arrest makes this country safer. Every national security threat we take off the street and deport makes us safer. Video: The problem is that the bulk of those being arrested and deported aren’t criminals or national security. They are average people who have done nothing criminally wrong. Remember, illegal entry into the country, overstaying a visa, is a civil offense, not a criminal offense. According to Homan, the problem is that everybody wants Trump to fail, and that is why America has gone sour on the Trump immigration policy. There is a group of people who do appear to be violating the law, and Homan admitted that it is the Trump administration. Read more

PoliticusUSA is news that puts readers first, because readers are the sole source of support for our work. To support PoliticusUSA, please consider becoming a subscriber. Subscribe now Democrats have changed tactics and it seems to be paying off. One of the lessons that Democrats learned from 2024 is running a bunch of ads and assuming the voters understand and get it is not the most effective strategy. In 2025, with Trump back in the White House, Democrats and their progressive allies have been taking their message to the voters face-to-face. Democrats aren’t just staying in blue or purple areas, they are heading to some of the most conservative states and districts in the country to deliver the message that the Republican controlled federal government isn’t working for them. Rep. Ro Khanna is taking this message to one of the reddest states in the country by visiting South Carolina. Axios reported: Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) is taking his “benefits over billionaires” tour to South Carolina next week, holding town halls in GOP districts in the deep south. … Khanna will also use the trip to troll Republicans and talk directly to some of their voters, including those who rely on Medicaid. Khanna will participate alongside Rep. Jonathan Jackson (D-Ill.) in town hall meetings in the districts of Republicans Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.) and William Timmons (R-S.C.). Timmons’ district is more solidly Republican, but Democrats are eyeing Mace’s seat. “The Mace one is a winnable district, light red,” Khanna said. “That’s exactly the type of district which we could win if we put in the effort, but it’s not a give-me.” PoliticusUSA is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support our work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. It was very nice of Republicans to put the most significant issue of the 2026 and maybe 2028 election in policy terms by passing a massive tax cut for the rich that is in part paid for by cuts to services for everyone else. The divide among the electorate should not be red versus blue, but the billionaires versus everyone else. A lot of people in South Carolina are going to be harmed by the so-called Big Beautiful Bill, and Democrats are showing up in the state to tell Republican voters what their representatives have done to them. The most impactful contact that can be made with voters is in-person contact, and Democrats are going to be in Republican districts through election day 2026, spreading the message. What do you think of Rep. Khanna’s South Carolina town halls? Join the conversation in the comments below. Leave a comment

PoliticusUSA can only stay independent with the support of readers like you. Please consider supporting us by becoming a subscriber. Subscribe now After a tragedy like the flash flood in central Texas that has now killed hundreds of people, there are always questions about what happened, what could have been done differently, and if such a tragic event could be prevented in the future. Any president visiting the site where such a loss of life occurred should be prepared for those types of questions. They aren’t unusual or out of line. A reporter asked Donald Trump, “Several families we’ve heard from are obviously upset because they say that those warnings, those alerts, didn’t go out in time, and they also say that people could have been saved. What do you say to those families?” The question was especially appropriate because the reporter who asked it was CBS Texas. A local reporter asked a question of the president that was very important to the families. Trump immediately got defensive and melted down by answering, “Well, I think everyone did an incredible job under the circumstances. This was, I guess as Kristi said, a one in 500, once-in-1,000-year event. And I just have admiration for the job that everybody did. There’s this admiration. Only a bad person would ask a question like that, to be honest with you. I don’t know who you are, but only a very evil person would ask a question like that.” Video: Read more