PRIVATE BLOG – Bonds – Back to 1792 Private blog posts are exclusively available to Socrates subscribers. To sign-up for Socrates or to learn more, please visit Ask-Socrates.com. https://ask-socrates.com/
What’s The Current Economic Situation In Mexico? Mexico’s economy grew by a revised 0.6% in Q2 from the previous quarter, slightly below the earlier estimate of 0.7%. The figure came in stronger than markets had expected and highlighted the economy’s ability to hold up despite U.S. tariffs. Growth was broad-based, with construction, finance, manufacturing and retail all contributing. Retail, in particular, likely got a boost from healthy tourism, rising real wages and low unemployment. That said, the pace of GDP growth looks set to cool in Q3: Lean government spending, weak remittances, U.S. tariffs on certain exports and uncertainty around U.S. trade policy are expected to weigh on activity. On the brighter side, the Central Bank’s continued monetary easing should give domestic demand some breathing room. How Is Mexico’s Inflation Trending? Inflation in Mexico has averaged close to the top of the Central Bank’s 2.0–4.0% target range so far this year, due largely to cost pressures in food and housing. Price rises for clothing and transport have been comparatively mild—the latter due to the recent fall in global energy prices. Our Consensus is for Mexico’s inflation to remain close to the top of the target range in the coming quarters, propped up by lower interest rates, solid wage growth and peso weakening. How Will The Peso Perform Ahead? The peso has strengthened so far this year against the dollar, thanks to solid export growth plus investor concerns over U.S. economic policy and institutional independence weighing on the greenback. However, our panelists expect the peso to progressively lose ground in the coming quarters as Banxico cuts interest rates by more than the Fed. The currency is likely to remain volatile, though, with sources of uncertainty including U.S. migration policy, the outcome of the USMCA renegotiation in 2026 and further domestic reforms that are perceived by the market to weaken democratic safeguards. Failure to renew the trade deal with the U.S. and Canada—or a new agreement that has much less favorable terms for Mexico—could dampen the peso, as could domestic democratic backsliding or rising U.S. deportations hitting remittances inflows to Mexico. How Are U.S. Tariffs Impacting Mexico? Current U.S. tariffs on Mexico include those on goods not compliant with the USMCA trade deal plus sector-specific tariffs on aluminium, cars, copper and steel. Despite this, non-oil exports from Mexico to the U.S. have risen about 6% in annual terms so far this year. This partly reflects Mexican firms’ success in making many goods USMCA-compliant so as to avoid tariffs, plus some frontloading by firms. For more information check our dedicated article on U.S. tariffs against Mexico. Perhaps the biggest impact of the tariffs to date is one that is less visible: A loss of new business investment. For instance, major electric car producers BYD and Tesla have both recently cancelled plans to build factories in Mexico due to trade uncertainty. On trade negotiations with the U.S., Itaú Unibanco analysts said: “We believe that Mexican authorities will continue to engage constructively with their US counterparts [on trade]. Negotiations are ongoing and are expected to continue until at least the end of next year, with a USMCA renegotiation likely to occur afterward. As the US is currently managing several trade deals, a USMCA renegotiation is likely to take place only at the end of 2026 or the beginning of 2027. Stricter local content laws should be the focus of all negotiations.” How Is U.S. Immigration Policy Affecting Remittances? The Trump administration is currently ramping up deportations, while the number of people crossing the Mexican border illegally has fallen to close to zero. The upshot is that remittances to Mexico from the U.S. fell year on year for the fourth month in a row in July. Going forward, remittances are likely to continue to be weighed on by deportations, reduced border crossings and a softer labor market. A remittances tax due to take effect in the coming months will be a further drag if implemented. What Is Our Panelists’ View on Fiscal Policy? After an election-related spending surge in 2024, the government has run a tight fiscal ship so far this year. In the first seven months of 2025, current spending was roughly flat year on year while capital spending plummeted by over a third following the completion of the former president’s key infrastructure projects. Our panelists expect Mexico’s fiscal deficit to narrow this year vs 2024 but to remain sizable at 3.8% of GDP—much larger than the past decade’s average. The fiscal deficit is forecast to remain above 3.0% of GDP in the coming years due to elevated social spending commitments, which coupled with weak GDP growth potential, will see public debt rise as a share of the economy in future years. On the fiscal outlook, EIU analysts said: “In its 2025 budget plan, the government projected a decline in spending as well as a modest improvement in revenue. We expect the overall effect to be a narrowing of the fiscal deficit from 4.9% of GDP in 2024 to 3% by 2029. However, this process will be gradual, and we expect some slippage past the consolidation targets that the administration has outlined for the immediate term. Ms Sheinbaum has a raft of spending priorities, including popular social programmes, and she has not proposed tax increases. The budget maintains a heavy emphasis on social spending, which Ms Sheinbaum will refrain from rationalising, despite the high cost. Plan México, the ambitious economic development strategy, will add further pressure, as will the need for unbudgeted spending towards policy concessions to the US, including in border security and migration management.” Goldman Sachs’ Alberto Ramos said: “Overall, fiscal consolidation is expected to continue, albeit at a gradual and unambitious pace and backloaded to 2027/28. We anticipate growing pressures on the spending side of the budget, particularly on rising pension payments, and a growing need for a tax reform/package, likely after the 2027 mid-term elections.” How is Central Bank Policy Set To Evolve? After four consecutive 50 basis point reductions, the Central Bank
Joan Walsh Prominent Republicans are attacking anyone who insists on describing who the late Charlie Kirk and his movement really were, even trying to get them fired. The post Alleged Free Speech Champions Are Campaigning Against Speech They Don’t Like appeared first on The Nation.
If credibility is degraded, then tariff induced cost-push shocks are less likely to manifest as one-off price level increases, and more likely to spur a bout of inflation. Figure 1: Bordo-Siklos measure of Fed inflation credibility (blue). Calculation assumes CPI target consistent with PCE target is 2.45%. September observation is preliminary. Light orange shading denotes Trump administrations. Orange dashed line at “Liberation Day”. NBER defined peak-to-trough recession dates shaded gray. Source: BLS, NBER, author’s calculations. From Bloomberg: “To the extent that the Fed’s decision this week is seen as a capitulation to political pressure, a new layer of risk is being added to US financial markets and the dollar,” [ David Kelly, chief global strategist at JPMorgan Asset Management] said. See also Griffin-Kashyap in WSJ. Appellate court decision on Cook v. Trump
QUESTION: I believe you have said that the United States practices the law of tyrants, conspiracy, which only proves a thought crime, not that you committed a crime. Is this why you say we are doomed, because nobody will do real legal reform? Wes ANSWER: Our legal system adopted the tyranny of the king and replaced him with the Department of JUST US. Its combination of the Pinkerton rule, broad federal statutes like RICO, and the strategic, frequent use by prosecutors makes American conspiracy law one of the most potent and expansive in the world. The United States has the most anti-human rights legal system on the planet. For example, under Canon Law used in France, they cannot compel any family member to testify against you. In the United States, they can imprison your children until they testify against you. The only privilege is granted to a spouse or a priest. Then they will use a divorce to get around the spouse rule. Under the Canon law of the Catholic Church, the sanctity of the family unit comes first. Under English Common Law, precedent takes precedent. We had a revolution against the king’s tyranny, replacing him with local tyranny. They love to call Russia and China authoritarian and communist. But look at the stats. You have a 340% greater chance of going to jail in the United States compared to China. The United States has the highest percentage of its population in prison of any country in the world, so much for liberty. Suppose you lie to a government official; that is perjury, punishable by up to 5 years. If a government official lies to you, that is legal. Without the rule of law, civilization crumbles. Courts rule in favor of the government. Rarely will you find a judge who will truly defend the Constitution, and good luck in prosecuting a judge or a prosecutor. Region/Country Incarceration Rate (per 100,000 population) As a Percentage of the Population Year/Source USA 531 0.531% 2024 Canada 104 0.104% 2023 Japan 36 0.036% 2021 Russia 300 0.300% 2023 China 121 0.121% 2018 Europe 73 (Western Europe median) 0.073% 2024 South America 305 0.305% 2024 (calculated from regional data)
What’s The Current Economic Situation In Mexico? Mexico’s economy grew by a revised 0.6% in Q2 from the previous quarter, slightly below the earlier estimate of 0.7%. The figure came in stronger than markets had expected and highlighted the economy’s ability to hold up despite U.S. tariffs. Growth was broad-based, with construction, finance, manufacturing and retail all contributing. Retail, in particular, likely got a boost from healthy tourism, rising real wages and low unemployment. That said, the pace of GDP growth looks set to cool in Q3: Lean government spending, weak remittances, U.S. tariffs on certain exports and uncertainty around U.S. trade policy are expected to weigh on activity. On the brighter side, the Central Bank’s continued monetary easing should give domestic demand some breathing room. How Is Mexico’s Inflation Trending? Inflation in Mexico has averaged close to the top of the Central Bank’s 2.0–4.0% target range so far this year, due largely to cost pressures in food and housing. Price rises for clothing and transport have been comparatively mild—the latter due to the recent fall in global energy prices. Our Consensus is for Mexico’s inflation to remain close to the top of the target range in the coming quarters, propped up by lower interest rates, solid wage growth and peso weakening. How Will The Peso Perform Ahead? The peso has strengthened so far this year against the dollar, thanks to solid export growth plus investor concerns over U.S. economic policy and institutional independence weighing on the greenback. However, our panelists expect the peso to progressively lose ground in the coming quarters as Banxico cuts interest rates by more than the Fed. The currency is likely to remain volatile, though, with sources of uncertainty including U.S. migration policy, the outcome of the USMCA renegotiation in 2026 and further domestic reforms that are perceived by the market to weaken democratic safeguards. Failure to renew the trade deal with the U.S. and Canada—or a new agreement that has much less favorable terms for Mexico—could dampen the peso, as could domestic democratic backsliding or rising U.S. deportations hitting remittances inflows to Mexico. How Are U.S. Tariffs Impacting Mexico? Current U.S. tariffs on Mexico include those on goods not compliant with the USMCA trade deal plus sector-specific tariffs on aluminium, cars, copper and steel. Despite this, non-oil exports from Mexico to the U.S. have risen about 6% in annual terms so far this year. This partly reflects Mexican firms’ success in making many goods USMCA-compliant so as to avoid tariffs, plus some frontloading by firms. For more information check our dedicated article on U.S. tariffs against Mexico. Perhaps the biggest impact of the tariffs to date is one that is less visible: A loss of new business investment. For instance, major electric car producers BYD and Tesla have both recently cancelled plans to build factories in Mexico due to trade uncertainty. On trade negotiations with the U.S., Itaú Unibanco analysts said: “We believe that Mexican authorities will continue to engage constructively with their US counterparts [on trade]. Negotiations are ongoing and are expected to continue until at least the end of next year, with a USMCA renegotiation likely to occur afterward. As the US is currently managing several trade deals, a USMCA renegotiation is likely to take place only at the end of 2026 or the beginning of 2027. Stricter local content laws should be the focus of all negotiations.” How Is U.S. Immigration Policy Affecting Remittances? The Trump administration is currently ramping up deportations, while the number of people crossing the Mexican border illegally has fallen to close to zero. The upshot is that remittances to Mexico from the U.S. fell year on year for the fourth month in a row in July. Going forward, remittances are likely to continue to be weighed on by deportations, reduced border crossings and a softer labor market. A remittances tax due to take effect in the coming months will be a further drag if implemented. What Is Our Panelists’ View on Fiscal Policy? After an election-related spending surge in 2024, the government has run a tight fiscal ship so far this year. In the first seven months of 2025, current spending was roughly flat year on year while capital spending plummeted by over a third following the completion of the former president’s key infrastructure projects. Our panelists expect Mexico’s fiscal deficit to narrow this year vs 2024 but to remain sizable at 3.8% of GDP—much larger than the past decade’s average. The fiscal deficit is forecast to remain above 3.0% of GDP in the coming years due to elevated social spending commitments, which coupled with weak GDP growth potential, will see public debt rise as a share of the economy in future years. On the fiscal outlook, EIU analysts said: “In its 2025 budget plan, the government projected a decline in spending as well as a modest improvement in revenue. We expect the overall effect to be a narrowing of the fiscal deficit from 4.9% of GDP in 2024 to 3% by 2029. However, this process will be gradual, and we expect some slippage past the consolidation targets that the administration has outlined for the immediate term. Ms Sheinbaum has a raft of spending priorities, including popular social programmes, and she has not proposed tax increases. The budget maintains a heavy emphasis on social spending, which Ms Sheinbaum will refrain from rationalising, despite the high cost. Plan México, the ambitious economic development strategy, will add further pressure, as will the need for unbudgeted spending towards policy concessions to the US, including in border security and migration management.” Goldman Sachs’ Alberto Ramos said: “Overall, fiscal consolidation is expected to continue, albeit at a gradual and unambitious pace and backloaded to 2027/28. We anticipate growing pressures on the spending side of the budget, particularly on rising pension payments, and a growing need for a tax reform/package, likely after the 2027 mid-term elections.” How is Central Bank Policy Set To Evolve? After four consecutive 50 basis point reductions, the Central Bank
Or, why should a bunch of ICE agents running amok in a Hyundai-LG factory have an impact on trade policy uncertainty? People tend to think of international trade and foreign direct investment as substitutes (one can import widgets into country A from country B, or alternatively a firm in Country B can build a new widget factory in Country A). That kind of makes sense in a world of differing goods, maybe without information asymmetries. However, when there are differentiated productions, supply chains, intellectual capital etc., it is perhaps more useful (especially in trade between advanced economies) to think of trade and FDI as complements (or FDI as technology transfer, as this was a chip manufacturing facility). In any case, see Chapter 6 of Chinn and Irwin (2025). So, here’re two trade policy uncertainty measures: Figure 1: EPU-Trade (blue, left scale), TPUD Caldara et al. (red, right scale). Source: policyuncertainty.com and Iacoviello. Given the impact of uncertainty on FDI (see e.g. Jardet, Jude, Chinn, 2023), it’s no wonder FDI fell in Q1.
Aviva Stahl New legislation could accelerate a growing movement of tenants who refuse to be at the mercy of developers and want to take ownership of their communities’ resources. The post Community Land Trusts Are Standing Up to New York City’s Worst Landlords appeared first on The Nation.
Nepal’s Prime Minister Khadga Prasad Oli resigned immediately after massive youth protests swept the nation and led to deadly clashes with police that left over 20 dead. Anger over government corruption has been rising. Youth unemployment surpassed 20% and people aged 15 to 40 compose 43% of Nepal’s population. The final straw was a nationwide ban on social media imposed on September 4, 2025. The youth took to the streets to demand immediate change. https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/NepalFinanceMinisterBeaten.mp4 Nepal’s Finance Minister, Bishnu Paudel, was chased through the streets by an angry mob. Paudel was beaten, stripped naked, and paraded through the streets in his underwear. RT posted the above video shortly after the incident, although it is unverified whether or not the man in the video is Paudel. PM Oli’s residence in Bhaktapur was set on fire, as was the residence of President Ram Chandra Paudel. Spectators say that the youth were continuously throwing petrol bombs at the residences as they burned to the ground. Politicians are becoming increasingly concerned over the growing discontent sweeping the world as the cost of living continues to soar. When we examine what has occurred in Nepal, it is not an isolated, random event. Governments are collapsing worldwide due to economic instability. My models have been showing that confidence in governments is collapsing everywhere, from Europe to South America, and Nepal is simply another example of this global trend. Undeterred by police tear gas, rioters breached Nepal’s Parliament building and burned it to the ground. Kathmandu’s Tribhuvan International Airport came to a standstill. The destruction lasted for two days until Oli accepted defeat and allegedly fled the country. Over 90 people have been hospitalized for wounds related to clashes with the police who were far outnumbered by persons and sheer rage. Nepal has always been a buffer state caught between India and China. Every time we see economic decline, corruption, or outside meddling, the population eventually turns against the political class. The overthrow of the Nepalese government is simply part of this larger cycle of anti-establishment movements that will continue to spread. Governments fall when the people no longer believe in their competence to govern. It does not matter if the system is a monarchy, a democracy, or a dictatorship—the cycle remains the same. We are heading into 2032, the culmination of the Economic Confidence Model, which marks a period of rising civil unrest, political fragmentation, and the overthrow of governments globally. Nepal may seem small on the geopolitical map, but its fall is part of the domino effect. From Pakistan to Sri Lanka, from Latin America to Europe, the same pattern is unfolding. The loss of faith in government as an institution has become a worldwide phenomenon and the people are beginning to direct their anger at government rather than against one another.
Leer en Español Global economy to lose steam this year: The FocusEconomics World GDP Consensus Forecast—based on 3,500 individual projections for GDP growth across 198 countries—shows that the global economy is on track for its slowest growth since the Covid-19 slump of 2020 this year, dragged down by softer expansions in major players like Brazil, Canada, China, Mexico, Russia and the U.S. But the picture isn’t bleak everywhere—Africa and the Middle East are set to accelerate, powered by rising OPEC+ oil output quotas that are giving regional GDP a welcome boost. Forecasts display U-shaped trend: As the graph below shows, our World GDP Consensus Forecast was slashed in the wake of Donald Trump’s announcement of reciprocal tariffs, but has since recovered somewhat. Economic activity in many parts of the world has proved more resilient than expected, higher tariffs in the U.S. are taking a while to filter through to prices, and the global AI boom is girding tech exports and investment. G20 countries see divergent trend: The below graph shows the evolution of our 2025 GDP growth forecasts for select G20 countries over the last six months. Argentina has seen the largest upgrade, as the government’s aggressive reform agenda has borne fruit. China’s forecasts have also been upgraded—superficially surprising, given the country has been subjected to hefty new U.S. tariffs. Chinese economic activity has been boosted by record government bond issuance, strong global electronics demand, rapid electric-vehicle-sector growth, export frontloading and rerouting to avoid U.S. tariffs, and an expanded trade-in scheme that boosted household spending. At the other end of the spectrum are the economies of South Korea and Mexico, both of which are likely to suffer fallout from a more protectionist U.S. Insight from our panelists: On the outlook for the global economy, EIU analysts said: US trade protectionism is being met mostly with restraint in terms of retaliation, but deep policy uncertainty is moving the global economy into a worse equilibrium. The risk of policy missteps will be high in this environment of rapid change. Although we forecast that global short-term interest rates will continue to fall, the unpredictable application of US tariffs will make it difficult for central banks to decipher inflation trends. Under the second Trump administration, the US is working to rebalance its economic and security relations. The manner in which the agenda is being pursued, however, will strain traditional alliances and drive geopolitical and economic realignment. Conflict risk and geopolitical brinkmanship will be key features of the global landscape, contributing to high risk premia and sustaining the risk of commodity price shocks. On U.S. trade policy, ING’s Carsten Brzeski said: “Trump is demanding that trading partners show him the money in the form of investment pledges or face astronomically high tariffs. […] It’s unclear whether investment aspects of trade talks will move beyond headline figures and vague commitments. Unlike tariffs, which are straightforward to enforce, investment pledges and purchase commitments are harder to monitor, especially since entities like the EU lack the authority to guarantee them, leaving delivery to corporations. Japan and South Korea’s promises are mainly in the form of loans. This raises questions about how the U.S. might respond if countries fall short. And even with a deal – and I’m looking at you, Switzerland – the tariff issue persists. For Trump, tariffs are a versatile tool, used well beyond trade balance concerns. We can only guess at the long-term implications of such economic power play. Disrupted supply chains, strained diplomatic ties, economic selfishness, and less efficient global trade are just a few things to come to mind.” Our latest analysis: Israel’s economy clocked a surprise contraction in Q2. Japan’s exports worsened again in July. The post Get the latest global GDP growth forecasts via our daily tracker appeared first on FocusEconomics.
